No personal data is collected. The quiz runs entirely on this page; nothing you answer is stored or transmitted.
This course crosses international law — specifically human rights and humanitarian topics — international relations, business, policy and communication. At this point you know the basic structure and assumptions of the course. The complex relationships between its disciplines, interacting with your interests and your own personal background, can be approached in several different ways. The objective of this quiz is, through a series of rapid forced-choice questions, to get you to visualize possible ways to enhance and apply the contents of this course — and to start our next conversation. It is not a vocational test: rather, a snapshot of how course contents can spark a conversation with your academic trajectory, inviting questioning and dialogue.
These are emphases, not identities. The compass describes where your attention goes today, not who you are. It is designed to be retaken — on any day of the course — to see whether the course moved it.
Answer by attraction, not ability. Fourteen pairs of concrete tasks. Pick the one you would rather own — not the one you think you'd be better at, and not the one that sounds more virtuous. The options carry no labels; you cannot play to a result.
Nothing is stored. Everything happens in this page. At the end you will see a short code: it encodes only your fourteen choices — no personal data — and lets you re-find this exact result later. You can also print your result (or save it as a PDF).
If you took the compass before and noted your code, enter it here to rebuild your results exactly as they were.
The compass is a forced-choice instrument: fourteen pairs of concrete tasks, with each of the seven roles appearing in exactly four pairs, options unlabeled and shown in random order so the result cannot be steered. It measures relative attraction — which work you pick when something must be picked — which is why every profile sums to exactly 14 and there is no “neither” option: the fixed total is what makes your result comparable to other people's, and to your own later retakes. The output ranks emphases; it says nothing about ability, and it is not a verdict about who you are.
This instrument is part of the course “Strategic Leadership in Human Rights and Humanitarian Business Practices” — 2026 edition.
Pick the task you would rather own. There are no wrong answers and no hidden “best” path.
If you want to keep track of these results and suggestions, take note of the code shown above. It encodes only your fourteen choices — no personal data — and entering it on the start page rebuilds this exact result at any time. You can retake the compass on any day and compare; movement is expected — it is what a course is for.
Read the valleys as carefully as the peaks: a low bar is a finding about where your attention goes, not a failing. And if some pairs attracted you in neither direction, note which ones — that is information too, unscored on purpose; bring it to a later retake.
Each of the remaining profiles is an angle present in this course, and your lower counts are part of the result too. Would you like to see them?
In the minutes after the quiz, share your reaction to the results and suggestions. Do they fit your perceptions at this moment? Do they broaden your horizon on what to expect from this course?
For fifteen minutes, explore how much you identify with different aspects of the result — and where its elements sit far from your own perspective. Distance is as useful as fit: both start the conversation.
When the facilitator asks, raise your hand for your first trend. Look around as the hands go up: this is what interdisciplinarity actually looks like — the same syllabus, entered through seven different doors, sitting in one room. The people whose hands went up at other words are the colleagues your future work will depend on.
Printing opens the system dialog; choose “Save as PDF”.